Hey
Readers,
We have some cool
new things happening around here, and I'm excited.
We are now going to open up our mail list, so
you no longer have to come back here and see what's
new...we will e-mail you instead. Next, you may
have noticed on the main page of our website,
it now tell you when the last page was updated,
so there's no searching. We're trying very hard
to give you all thebest possible experience when
you visit my web site.
On to music business.
The CMA Fest CD is DONE!!!! it was a long hard
road, but we finally nailed it and can relax for
a week before Fan Fair. Take a look at the cover
below...

Let's
all hope and pray that we can make something happen
with this one. Last night, while sitting up in
my office, I wrote a BLOG post on my Myspace page
and I'd really like to share it all with you.
I wish you could comment on it, but we have been
hit with Spammers so we had to shut the commenting
down...all it takes is a few losers to ruin for
everyone. If you'd like to comment on it, please
do so on my myspace page.
www.myspace.com/pauljcummings
When
It Comes To Recording Vocals
By
Paul Cummings
Vocals in studio
are some of the most overworked sections of a
song and it's obvious in most cases. Have you
ever wondered why your favorite singer always
sounds terrible when they're live? You can thanks
today's recording standard for that. When a singer
walks into the studio on the last few days of
production, he/she will literally sing a song
25 - 100 times, or even more. 1 SONG!!!! After
the singing part is complete, engineers break
every workd apart, and piece all the tracks
together to give you a product that is perfect.
They will adjust tempo, pitch, and tone. Tell
me, is this what music is suppossed to be like?
What happened to needing talent?
I often wish music
could travel back in time to the 50s and 60s.
To the days when you had a band, and when you
went into record, it was in a live environment.
They didn't have computers, nor did they have
ANYTHING digital. Everything was recorded in analog,
and everything you heard on the record, was what
you would hear live. Today's music, well that
just isn't the case anymore, and half the time,
the band you hear on the CD is not the band the
artist uses on stage.
With all that
being said, we approach our work in the studio
a little different than most people do. I want
my music to sound good, but at the same time I
don't want it to be fake. I want to be able to
go on stage and sound as close to the CD as possible.
We spend most of our time in studio making sure
the music is solid, then we venture into cutting
my voice.
When I start a
new song, I take it home and make any changes
I want to there. I analyze how I sing certain
words, and work on my pitch and tone. I also spend
a great deal of time on dynamics. Coming from
a background playing the sax in jazz bands, I
learned how important dynamics were at a very
young age. I don't go to bed, or take a break
until I am comfortable with how I sing the song.
Usually the next
day we hit the studio to lay the vocals down.
I take 2-3 warmup runs as my producer Pat gets
the board set up. We record the warmups so we
can analyze the sound of my voice. Once we're
happy, it's time to go to work. I believe in recording
no more than 5 vocal tracks. All the singers reading
this right now are probably saying in their heads,
(Bullshit). BUT, im not lying. To me, that is
the breaking point. After 5 takes, all the natural
emotion is gone, and the feeling is gone, and
it simply becomes a routine and quite honestly,
boring. Not to mention, it makes for a miserable
post editing session because there is a LOT to
listen to. If I can't nail a song in 5 takes,
I should NOT be singing it. Most songs however,
only take around 3 takes.
After im done
singing, we immediatly post edit the song. Unlike
most singers, NO PITCH CORRECTION OR FILTERING
IS USED ON MY VOICE. I strongly do not believe
in that, it's terrible. Some of the most popular
singers today rely on this crap even when they're
on stage, I won't mention any names.
Here's how it
works. We listen to each take one at a time. We
listen closely for errors and at the end we rate
each track. We sort from Best to Worst and begin
our process. Some of the digital tools we take
advantage of are cutting and pasting, but at a
minimum. The finished product is a result of large
pieces from 2 or more tracks, but completly raw.
We literally start recording and 2 hours later
have a finished product (unless Im also recording
my own backup vocals that day). What you hear
on that recording is something you WILL hear at
my live show which makes me more confident when
people comment on the music, saying it's good...why
do I become more confident? Because that's me,
and not a computer clone of my voice.
Now, I have never
been one to care for the way my voice sounds,
but most singers feel the same way. Any singer
that tells you they are 100% in love with their
own voice is either lying, topped out, too confident,
or what they hear on CD is SO enhanced they can't
hear themselves in the song anymore. I have just
learned to accept my voice, but everytime I hear
it, it makes me want to work harder so next time
maybe I will enjoy it. I never usually end up
enjoying it, so now you know why Paul Cummings
here has turned himself into a workaholic, it's
a circle.
Many of my peers
I hate to say, sound 10 times better on their
CD's as they do live, and many of them who read
this will be upset with me because they know who
they are. There are a small percentage out there
who keep their heads screwed on and actually have
talent outside the studio without all the fancy
computer tools. Those people don't allow their
voices to be turned into diamonds...their philosophy
is, this is what I am, this is what you get. If
you like it, GREAT...if not, sorry to hear that.
Any artist I ever promote will be of this mind,
and they are true to their music...
Thanks everyone
for reading this today, be sure to check out the
music we have posted in the music section. Thanks!
Paul C
|